by Tessa Poe on September 13th, 2011, 12:12 pm
I've always had to be careful about how I approach conversations about that day, mostly because there's a little bit of hypocrisy to the reaction. Don't misunderstand me, it was a horrendous act of terrorism and I have every sympathy with the victims of it, but at the same time...
Here in the UK we went through the 'Troubles' (such a very British way to term the violence) in Northern Ireland and in England for years and the IRA were funded by wealthy US citizens and even charity collections. I guess the fact that these attacks were going on while I was growing up, to the point where the IRA had the wherewithall to launch a mortar attack on 10 Downing Street, the seat of power in this country, sort of meant that I didn't scream and shout when the attacks happened and the towers came down. It's true it's unprecendented in terms of scale, but when you hear on the news that another bomb's gone off and killed x number of people at least once a month, or a bomb's been found and disarmed that could have killed x number of people, then you do get a little desensitised to it all.
Beyond that though, if we go further back there's the lovely links between the US government and the Taliban and even Al-Quaeda themselves, at least in the early days of them, where the US government was directly funding/training/supplying them to oppose the Russians. Hell if we go back as recently as 2007 there were allegations of the US government funding terrorists in Iran to destablise the regime there.
Now the UK's government isn't much better, we've been supplying arms to Libya and Gaddafi for years, as well as using facilities in Libya to side-step human rights and interrogation legislation designed to stop cruel and inhumane treatment, we were dealing with Saddam until the first Gulf War just like the US goverment of the time too...
I swear I had a point to all this somewhere.
I guess the point is simply that while what happened was a horrendous act of murder, just as you correctly termed it Goss, there has to be some understanding of the role that the Western Nations have played in all of this, and are possibly still playing. One of the wierdest conversations I had was with someone (who I won't name) who we met while we lived out in Saudi Arabia. She worked for the US embassy, we never found out what her official job title was, all I know is if she gave a US Marine an order he'd follow it. Anyway she came to visit here just when the Libya situation was just starting out and started telling us about a conversation she had with some colleagues. Said conversation was about where the oil was located within Libya, how close it was to where the rebels had started out and how easy it would have been to see to it that the rebels against Gadaffi were supplied with everything they'd have needed to take and hold the regions that were important i.e. that had the oil supply. It's true that this attitude didn't set the policy for the Libyan conflict this time around, but at the same time the people she was talking to apparently didn't disagree with her. There's always the potential that the next time something like this happens that's exactly what one government or another will do. When it comes down to it It's something that I've always got in mind while watching the mourning at the loss of life and celebrating the heroism of those who tried to minimise it, the roles our own governments have played in bringing us to this point.